Should Canada Prepare for a World Where U.S. Leadership Is Less Certain?

- Advertisement -

Does the U.S. no longer seem to be inclined to be the guarantor of world order? So, is it the right time for the rest of the world to take up this responsibility?

On Saturday, 28 February, the United States and Israel launched a war on Iran. The US-Israeli military attacks came without prior warning or approval by the United Nations. It targeted and killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Just 2 months earlier, the US launched another similar attack on Venezuela. In that instance, the U.S. special forces kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from his residence in Caracas and transferred him to New York, where Maduro now faces criminal charges in federal court.

In between these 2 violent military attacks, the possible annexation of Greenland and the suggestion of Canada becoming a part of the US have also caused a lot of unrest in Canada. Many Canadians have called for boycotts of US products.

Should Canada Prepare for a World Where U.S. Leadership Is Less Certain?

These and other recent developments demonstrate that the world order the U.S. previously helped in establishing in 1945 may no longer serve the U.S.’s interests.

For eight decades, US financial resources, diplomatic efforts, and military power sustained this international architecture. Regardless of criticisms regarding the exercise of that power, the magnitude of the US’s commitment was remarkable. The US did not have to do this, although it chose to, as it believed that maintaining this international architecture would promote global stability and prevent the rise of authoritarian regimes.

8 decades later, the world of 2026 bears little resemblance to 1945. Europe has been rebuilt. China has grown. Canada, Japan, South Korea and many Gulf states are prosperous. Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria, India, Vietnam and many other countries are expanding.

Threats such as climate change, pandemics, and terrorism were barely conceivable during the drafting of the UN Charter. Therefore, it is reasonable for Americans to ask why they should continue bearing a disproportionate burden for a system designed for a world that no longer exists.

 

Roshan Abayasekara
Roshan Abayasekara
Roshan Abayasekara Was seconded by Sri Lankan blue chip conglomerate - John Keells Holdings (JKH) to its fully owned subsidiary - Mackinnon Mackenzie Shipping (MMS) in 1995 as a Junior Executive. MMS in turn allocated me to it’s principle – P&O Containers regional office for container management in South Asia region. P&O Containers employed British representatives

Hot this week

When Anonymous Letters Stir a Village Storm: Inside Enid Blyton’s Clever Mystery

Enid Blyton’s The Mystery of Spiteful Letters is a...

Eyes in the Sky: Australia’s Wedgetail Takes Flight as Gulf Tensions Demand Vigilance and Restraint.

The deployment of a high-tech surveillance jet by Australia...

Are Mesophases the Golden Path to Better Nanomaterials and Crystal Formation?

Science & Technology (Commonwealth Union) – When a carefully...

Stranded on the Tarmac: How Geopolitics Took the Field in Cricket

A travel fiasco has turned into a public relations...

Fish Numbers Falling in WA -Will Banning Fishing Really Help?

Fishing for demersal fish species, which live close to...
- Advertisement -

Related Articles

- Advertisement -sitaramatravels.comsitaramatravels.com

Popular Categories