The Australian government, led by Industry and Science Minister Ed Husic, is poised to address the challenges posed by rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) technologies through a comprehensive response to a consultation process on safe and responsible AI in the country. The government’s interim response, to be released on Wednesday, acknowledges the potential economic benefits of AI, citing McKinsey research estimating a boost of up to $600 billion annually to Australia’s GDP through the adoption of AI and automation.
Despite the optimistic economic outlook, the response emphasizes public concerns regarding the ethical use of AI, particularly in high-risk applications such as self-driving cars and job application assessments. Husic stated that while the government aims to support the growth of low-risk AI applications, there is a clear demand for stronger regulations to manage higher-risk AI scenarios. The response reflects a commitment to identifying and addressing potential risks associated with AI technologies.
Surveys cited in the government’s paper reveal that only one-third of Australians believe there are sufficient safeguards in place for the design and development of AI. Recognizing the need for increased public trust, the government plans to establish an expert advisory group dedicated to the development of AI policy. Additionally, a voluntary “AI safety standard” will be introduced as a unified reference for businesses seeking to integrate AI technologies responsibly. The government intends to collaborate with industry stakeholders to implement new transparency measures.
Proposed measures include mandatory safeguards, such as pre-deployment risk and harm prevention testing for new AI products, and accountability measures, including training standards for software developers. The interim response paper underscores the importance of ongoing consultation and review processes for areas requiring reform, with transparency measures like public reporting on AI model training data being considered.
A noteworthy suggestion put forth for consideration is the implementation of a voluntary code regarding watermarks or labeling of AI-generated content. The government plans to engage with industry to explore the merits of such labeling practices, which could contribute to increased transparency and accountability in the deployment of AI-generated content.
The paper highlights specific concerns related to “high-risk” AI systems, such as those predicting recidivism or suitability for a job, as well as concerns about “frontier” AI systems capable of generating new content rapidly. The speed and scale of AI development, as outlined in the paper, pose challenges to existing legislative frameworks designed to be technology-neutral, indicating the need for adaptive regulations.
The submissions received during the consultation process raised issues across at least ten areas of law that might require reform to address AI-related challenges. These include considerations on whether the use of AI to create deepfakes could be subject to consumer law, potential risks in healthcare AI models under privacy law, and the copyright implications of using existing content to train generative AI models.
Of particular concern are generative AI models like the ChatGPT text bot and the Dall-E image generator, which create new content based on existing data. This has prompted legal actions, such as The New York Times’ recent lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for using its content to train AI models.
Husic emphasized the government’s commitment to incorporating safe and responsible practices early in the design, development, and deployment of AI. To expedite responses to technological developments, an advisory body has been appointed to bring together experts in AI for collaborative mapping of future strategies.
In summary, the Australian government’s interim response seeks to strike a balance between fostering the growth of AI for economic benefit and addressing public concerns through the implementation of robust regulatory frameworks and transparency measures. The proposed actions underscore the government’s commitment to responsible AI development and deployment in the face of evolving technological landscapes.
