US Magazine People, ahead of the rebooted paperback which is out on 31 August – the date of Princess Diana’s death in 1997.
If it’s not a message from Harry that he has sanctioned the book, and its new contents, it’s certainly a compelling coincidence. The anonymous friend is quoted in the new epilogue by the authors.
Scobie commented that “The Queen’s ‘recollections may vary’ comment ‘did not go unnoticed’ by the couple, who a close source said were ‘not surprised’ that full ownership was not taken,”
The statement about The Queen’s memory was in reference to the couple’s claim a member of the Royal Family had asked about the skin colour of their child.
The damning words suggest strongly that neither Harry nor Meghan is willing to extend an olive branch, and have either given up or are hoping for a show of further concern from the Queen and other close relations, including Prince Charles and his brother William, before any reconciliation is possible.
After multiple reports about the new comments were published Scobie clarified the statement on Twitter.
He said: “The comments made by a SOURCE (a detail some outlets have purposefully ignored) were about a lack of ownership from the royal institution as a whole. There is no “attack” against the Queen anywhere in the book.”
Despite Harry’s visit to the unveiling of Diana’s statue at Kensington Palace in July, where he was…
