India (Commonwealth Union)_ India’s plans to enhance mobile internet connectivity in its northeastern states have encountered a significant obstacle, as Bangladesh’s interim government has canceled a crucial bandwidth transit agreement that was previously approved. The move threatens to disrupt India’s efforts to improve digital infrastructure and connectivity in the region. According to media reports, Bangladesh’s internet regulatory body, the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC), has decided to scrap the agreement that would have enabled Bangladesh to serve as a transit point for bandwidth from Singapore to India’s northeastern states.
Also read: Jailed Hindu monk left defenseless: Has justice failed in Bangladesh?
Concerns that the deal could undermine Bangladesh’s aspirations to become a regional hub for internet services led to the decision on December 1. The agreement had involved the collaboration of Bangladeshi companies, including Summit Communications and Fiber@Home, with Indian telecom giant Bharti Airtel. The canceled deal was meant to address the growing demand for high-speed internet in India’s remote northeastern states. By routing bandwidth through the Akhaura border, the initiative aimed to provide a more reliable and cost-effective solution for the region’s connectivity needs. However, the BTRC’s decision indicates that, from the perspective of the Bangladeshi government, the plan offered no substantial economic benefits to the country, while heavily favoring India’s digital infrastructure.
Also read: Is Bangladesh crisis threatening India’s booming medical tourism?
India has expressed concerns about this development, particularly since it appears that factors beyond economics are driving the move. Sources suggest that ongoing political tensions between the two countries may have played a role in the decision. The cancellation also reflects broader internal power struggles within Bangladesh. Accordingly, Summit Communications and Fiber@Home, the two companies involved in the proposal, have close ties to Bangladesh’s ruling party, the Awami League. Mohammad Farid Khan, chairman of Summit Communications, is the younger brother of Faruk Khan, a senior leader and Member of Parliament from the Awami League. With the interim government of Fakhruddin Ahmed Yunus at the helm, the cancellation appears to be a strategic move to reduce the influence of companies linked to the Awami League and assert greater control over the country’s telecommunication policies.
Also read: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Speaks Out Against Hindu Persecution in Bangladesh
The political situation in Bangladesh has been unstable in recent months. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s removal from power due to violent protests led to the establishment of an interim government under Yunus’s leadership in August. Since then, there have been increasing reports of unrest, particularly concerning violence against minorities, including Hindus, which has further complicated the bilateral relationship between Bangladesh and India. Despite international outcry, the Yunus government has failed to adequately address these concerns. Furthermore, the canceled agreement is a setback for India’s broader telecommunication goals, particularly the project aimed at improving internet access in the northeastern states. This region has long faced challenges in terms of digital connectivity, and the project was seen as a key solution to bridging the gap between these remote areas and the rest of the country.
The impact of this decision extends beyond just a disrupted deal. It calls into question the future of regional cooperation in South Asia, particularly in the areas of telecommunication and digital infrastructure. Historically underserved in internet connectivity, India’s northeastern states now face even greater challenges in accessing reliable bandwidth. India’s diplomatic and economic relationship with the two nations remains uncertain as it grapples with this unexpected setback. The cancellation of the bandwidth transit agreement adds another layer of complexity to an already strained relationship, and it is unclear how India will proceed with its digital connectivity initiatives in the region. The fate of future bilateral cooperation hinges on the resolution of these tensions.
