Commonwealth – On Monday, parliamentarians questioned officials at Environment and Climate Change Canada about the impact of recent federal policy announcements on the country’s progress towards achieving its climate goals. The scrutiny comes amid ongoing skepticism about whether Canada can meet its targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
The federal government has postponed or nixed a series of its most ambitious climate initiatives recently, enraging environmentalists and opposition politicians. Perhaps most disconcerting is the one-year delay in the mandate that automakers sell electric vehicles, which was roundly criticized as a step back in efforts to speed up the nation’s shift to cleaner transportation. The other major reversal is the removal of a federal loan program to finance Canadians to conduct green retrofits of homes. This program was previously considered one of the most important tools to pressure homes into making use of greener technology and lowering overall emissions in the household sector.
Prime Minister Mark Carney‘s first day in office began with him scrapping the consumer carbon price, a very public and often contentious policy that directly charged for emissions at the household level. The carbon price had been the cornerstone of Canada’s climate policy for decades, hoping not only to reduce emissions but also to encourage behavior and market change towards cleaner alternatives. Its removal has prompted rampant speculation as to whether or not the government still maintains aggressive emissions cuts as a priority.
Canada also formally pledged to reduce its greenhouse gases by 40–45 percent below the 2005 level by 2030. The objective was set under Canada’s global commitment in the Paris Agreement, and its achievement has been deemed central both to Canada’s image globally and to reducing the impacts of global warming. Yet, the Canadian Climate Institute’s latest report starkly questions the viability of this goal under present policy trends. The report showed that under the recent rollbacks, Canada’s path is increasingly diverging from its assigned targets, putting the nation on a course to lose global leadership.
In Monday’s committee hearing, officials from Environment and Climate Change Canada were asked how the government intends to bridge the gap between where policy stands now and the 2030 deadline. Critics have already responded, arguing that delaying electric vehicle targets and eliminating consumer incentives significantly diminishes momentum in areas most in need of progress. Transportation is Canada’s single biggest polluter, and experts have consistently stated that without sped-up electrification, countrywide reduction targets will be impossible.
Also targeted for removal was the green retrofit loan program as a major obstacle. Houses and buildings represent the majority of the country’s emissions, and the program had provided a feasible means for homeowners to implement better heating, cooling, and insulation technology. Without cash available, analysts say, retrofit uptake rates will be slow, further strengthening Canada’s emissions arithmetic.
On top of these is the elimination of the consumer carbon price, which would send a strong signal about the price of pollution and encourage low-carbon consumption. Politician-unpopular, it had been suggested by economists as one of the most powerful methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in specific sectors. The elimination of the consumer carbon price has sparked a more esoteric debate about whether Canada is abandoning market-based climate policy in favor of less politically appealing options.
Experts continue that Canada is not alone in grappling with climate policy challenges amid evolving economic and political circumstances. Inflation, geopolitical rivalry, and affordability have all assisted in making climate policies increasingly difficult to sustain in many countries. Climate activists warn that delay will only drive up the long-term adaptation and mitigation expense.
The Ottawa administration is now facing pressure to determine if it will balance its international obligations with political and economic imperatives powering its domestic agenda. Ottawa is under pressure to develop a credible plan for reducing its emissions to meet its goals as the 2030 deadline approaches. By doing nothing, Ottawa not only could miss its emission reduction goals, but it also would harm Canada’s image as a serious player in the international battle against climate change.
